Munchkin

Archive for January, 2008

Jan31

Volcanic Eruptions: Historic Data

There’s no doubt about it: I’m creating the most boring climate blog around! Mostly, I’m just posting snippets of information as I find them, often with no particular interpretation. In comments at Real Climate, someone suggested people read “Internally and Externally Caused Climate Change” by Robock (1978). This paper describes the results […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: Data Comparisons

Jan28

Linear Thinking: Can we fit a line to figure out climate sensitivity?

In some comment thread at Climate Audit, Willis Eschenbach estimated the sensitivity of Hansen’s GISS II model by fitting a straight line to the data. I commented, that, at least if the climate behaved like a simple lumped parameter “thing”, that fit would give misleading results for the sensitivity of Hansen’s GISS model. […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: global climate change


Jan22

Yet another plot: Predicted Temperatures Using Monthly Forcings.

It’s weird to blog an analysis; it’s sort of like “stream of consciousness curve fitting.” Still, it’s sort of fun. I’m posting results relatively rapidly, and there is no doubt some of these will have errors. I’ll be embarrassed for about 5 minutes after I find them, and then I’ll get over […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: Data Comparisons

Jan17

Comparison of Hansen’s Forcing to Reality

a number of people are asking for information on the relative forcings in Scenarios A, B, and C. Gavin previously provided lots of scenario data and some plots to support an earlier blog post at Real Climate. However, I, and others in conversations at various blogs are interested in knowing how the volcanos […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: Data Comparisons


Jan17

The Volcano Blows! Dealing with Effect of Forcing for Global Climate Change

Yesterday, I announced my prediction of the global mean surface temperature (GMST) based on GISS Land/Ocean data. My prediction based on a very simple phenomenological model of climate with two parameters: time constant τ and inverse heat capacity α. I haven’t knocked all the kinks out of data analysis, but I made the […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: Climate Sensitivity

Jan16

Temperature Anomaly 2008: My Prediction.

I thought I’d announce my prediction for the temperature anomaly for 2008. I predict the average temperature anomaly for 2008, as reported by GISS Land/Ocean measurements will be 0.70 ± 0.11 C.
The ±0.11C is my hookey claim for the standard error. That means if my model is halfway decent, there is roughly a 2/3 […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: global climate change


Jan15

How large is global climate sensitivity to doubled CO2? This model says 1.7 C.

I came up with a simple empirical model to estimate climate sensitivity based on a global mean surface temperature record and estimated values of climate forcing. Using Land-Ocean GMST values from NASA GISS, I obtain a climate sensitivity of 1.7 C. This is below the range of climate sensitivity predicted by most […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: global climate change

Jan14

How Gavin’s Weather vs Climate Graphs Compare to Hansen Predictions?

I bet you wondering how Hansen et al. 1988 scenarios look compared to Gavin’s “Weather vs. Climate” graph? Well, here is his graph of the GISS Land Ocean data with the 8 year trend lines superimposed. Below is a similar graph showing the Hansen ABC predictions.

Yes, the trend for the Hansen ABC predictions are above […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: Data Comparisons


Jan13

Temperature Anomaly Compared to Hansen A, B, C: GISS Seems to Overpredict Warming.

Roger Pielke Jr. and John Tierney have recently been comparing published predictions of AGW to empirical data. In response, Gavin Schmidt suggested that comparisons should include more than 8 years, and pointed out that computations for Hansen et al. 1988 scenarios A, B, C began in 1983, as Gavin said last May, “giving […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: Data Comparisons

Jan11

Temperature Variability: Does it Reduce the Greenhouse Increment of 33C?

Recently, I posted a baseline analysis to illustrate the baseline problem that defines 33C as the greenhouse temperature increment; that analysis included a number of assumptions. Today, I’ll address a specific question that periodically appear at climate blogs. This question is:
Q: The simple based model assumes the earth is isothermal– that is everything has the […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: GHE




 

Popular Categories

No categories

About

You have no about page, you should add one through the admin interface, or edit 'footer.php' and put some super cool information here!

  • Recent Trackbacks:

    • Atmoz: Using Auto-Regressive Time Series to Constrain Calculated Temperature Trends
    • The Blackboard: IPCC projections do falsify (Or Are Swedes Tall?)
    • Climate Review: Schwartz und die Klimasensitivität
    • The Blackboard: The Volcano Blows! Dealing with Effect of Forcing for Global Climate Change
    • The Blackboard: What is the Climate Time Constant? Refining the Estimate I.