Munchkin

Archive for February, 2008

Feb28

What Does NASA Mean by Solar Variations Don’t Matter?

Raven drew my attention to something posted at NASA GISS, which implies that, for all practical purposes, normal variations in solar irradiance don’t affect their predictions of future warming trends.
On their web site discussing 2007 temperatures, NASA GISS displays a figure showing the variation in solar irradiance measured over time. I’ve reproduced […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: Uncategorized

Feb27

Chicago ‘Burbs February ‘08.

Last November, when visitors at
Unthreaded at Climate Audit were claiming that it was not unusually warm, on Nov. 16, I responded:
Bernie: It is darn warm in Chicago. I’ve got pepper plants that aren’t dead! My tomato plants are alive — but the tomatoes themselves are just green and lingering. It’s an eyesore, but I am […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: Weather Pictures


Feb26

Yet More on Falsification.

Roger Pielke Jr. and David Stockwell both asked… can we use 2001-2010 data to falsify IPCC values.

Now, as it happens, I don’t like to use already collected before a prediction to test a prediction. I don’t like that the IPCC does that.
But, oddly enough, the IPCC seems to do this all the […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: global climate change

Feb26

Can IPCC projections be falsified? Sample calculation

In my most recent post, I discussed hypothetical weather trends over the upcoming 5, 8 or 10 years that could, falsify the consensus position of climate chance, should they occur. In this post, I’ll discuss how I came up with the numbers statistics.
The steps to coming up with numerical values require me to:

Identify a […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: Statistics global climate change


Feb25

What weather would falsify the current consensus on climate change?

In January, Roger Pielke Jr. asked
What behavior of the climate system could hypothetically be observed over the next 1, 5, 10 years that would be inconsistent with the current consensus on climate change?
Meanwhile, Gavin Schmidt explained that we really can’t look at short-term weather to assess models. While Gavin’s answer is perfectly correct , […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: global climate change

Feb21

Spatial Variations in GMST Really DO Matter when Estimating Climate Sensitivity.

Today, once again, I will show that Dr. Pielke Sr. is correct:
Spatial variations in the Global Mean Surface Temperature do contribute to leading order to the anomalous radiative balance of the earth.
Why am I writing my third post on this?
Because, in response to my second post, a vistor in comments suggested that mine analysis […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: Climate Sensitivity global climate change


Feb19

Validation? Lumpy don’t need no stinkin’ validation!

However, the absence of influence of old data in the case of climate models will be impossible to prove, so I still think we have to insist that climate models accurately forecast future states of the atmosphere
So says W.M. Briggs; I agree. Quite honestly, despite the often contentious debates over the accuracy of climate […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: global climate change

Feb14

Spatial Variations in GMST II : Eli Rabbett vs Dr. Pielke Sr.

In my previous post, I discussed a Global Climate Change Blog Kerfuffle over the IPCC’s equation describing the radiative balance. The Kerfuffle involves one of the conclusions Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. reported in a recent peer reviewed article and two blog posts. .
Dr. Pielke’s fuller point is rather arcane and […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: global climate change


Feb13

Spatial Variations in the Temperature Anomalie: Atmoz vs. Pielke Sr.

There appears to be a Global Climate Change Blog Kerfuffle over the IPCC’s equation describing the radiative balance of the planet. At his blog, and in a peer reviewed article, Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. discussed several perplexing issues related to using Global Mean Surface Temperature Anomalies to understand changes in the heat […]

Continue Reading »

Filed in: global climate change

Feb12

Next on the agenda: Shovel the driveway.

It’s been snowing all day. I was thinking of bundling up to shovel, when someone at Climate Audit posted a link to ‘Minnesottan’s for Global Warming:’

Too funny. Now, time to bundle up and shovel the driveway.

Continue Reading »

Filed in: global climate change




 

Popular Categories

No categories

About

You have no about page, you should add one through the admin interface, or edit 'footer.php' and put some super cool information here!

  • Recent Trackbacks:

    • Atmoz: Using Auto-Regressive Time Series to Constrain Calculated Temperature Trends
    • The Blackboard: IPCC projections do falsify (Or Are Swedes Tall?)
    • Climate Review: Schwartz und die Klimasensitivität
    • The Blackboard: The Volcano Blows! Dealing with Effect of Forcing for Global Climate Change
    • The Blackboard: What is the Climate Time Constant? Refining the Estimate I.