Recently, David Stockwell has been discussing Rahmstorf et al 2007, focusing on how accounting for uncertainty in the data would affect interpretation of the IPCC TAR predictions relative to data. David has been focusing on issues related to the end points; today I want to discuss something much simpler. How does the uncertainty [...]
The Blackboard:
Where Climate Talk Gets Hot!
- Home ¦
- Archives ¦
- Pages & Links ¦
- Live Search
- ¦ Options
 Subscribe in a reader |
Recent Posts
Ninety Month Trends: IPCC AR4 2C/Century still outside ±95% uncertainty bands.
20th Jul | 0 CommentsIs this Called Framing the Debate?
17th Jul | 49 CommentsHypothesis test for 2C/century:
now with Monte Carlo!
17th Jul | 24 CommentsResult of Boring Series:
Gavin’s “Closer” Process Falsifies.
15th Jul | 33 CommentsAutoCorrelation for Averaged AR(1) process:
Boring post 2 in boring series.
14th Jul | 5 CommentsHow does averaging affect the variance of GMST?
(Boring Post 1 in series I promised)
14th Jul | 6 CommentsComparison to Gavin suggestion of AR(1)=0.1:
Preliminaries.
11th Jul | 22 Comments
About
You have no about page, you should add one through the admin interface, or edit 'footer.php' and put some super cool information here!
Recent Trackbacks:
- The Blackboard: Ninety Month Trends: IPCC AR4 2C/Century still outside ±95% uncertainty bands.
- The Blackboard: Hypothesis test for 2C/century: now with Monte Carlo!
- The Blackboard: Result of Boring Series: Gavin’s “Closer” Process Falsifies.
- The Blackboard: Result of Boring Series: Gavin’s “Closer” Process Falsifies.
- The Blackboard: AutoCorrelation for Averaged AR(1) process: Boring post 2 in boring series.
