Comments on: Climate Change Affects Sasquatch too!

By: Andrew_FL

Andrew_FL — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:00:13 +0000

Isn’t Niche Modeling David Stockwell’s specialty? I wonder what his comments would be…

By: Scooter

Scooter — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:26:02 +0000

What are the results from computer model projections of Sasquatch populations? Or are the results of clouds upon Sasquatch populations as unknown as in climate models?

By: David Jay

David Jay — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:13:15 +0000

Sasquatch and AGW. What a perfect confluence!

By: Douggerel

Douggerel — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:50:43 +0000

All Bigfoot needs to do is shave, and he will be able to remain in his original habitat. We need to airdrop razors and shaving cream into the forests, stat!

By: Rich

Rich — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:04:36 +0000

“Like Lozier, he wanted to show that models could turn dubious data into plausible-looking predictions.”

It’s not just climate scientists who should have that turned into a poster and stuck on their office walls.

By: kuhnkat

kuhnkat — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 04:54:30 +0000

Hmmm, this will probably make the list of must reads in the next IPCC report!!!

By: Scott Brim

Scott Brim — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:51:29 +0000

Back in May, 1980, about a week before Mt. St. Helens blew its top on May 18th, members of the press who were camped out in Randall, Washington waiting for something to happen asked the proprietor of a local motel/restaurant if she thought anything truly serious would occur. She responded, “Yes, forty Sasquatch carrying suitcases were seen leaving town last night.”

By: Bill Illis

Bill Illis — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 02:54:46 +0000

Between the sheep and the sasquatch, even the born-again pro-AGW’ers cannot help but make fun of how ridiculous the extent is to which they themselves have stretched the theory.

On the other hand, we have to be careful to not pollute the whole universe with our Carbon. In fact, we have to prevent large stars from forming which are the source (besides man) for all this Carbon pollution in the universe.

The last thing we need is Universe Warming in addition to Global Warming.

By: Les Johnson

Les Johnson — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:26:50 +0000

sigh…pedalogical? lets try “to do with podiatry”

ps – sorry to all the teachers out there, especially while discussing BF’s…ahhh….hmmm….you know….

By: Les Johnson

Les Johnson — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:06:01 +0000

Andrew: your
I can do without speculations on Sassy’s Shrinkage. Really. Quit.

No need to worry about Bigfoot’s shrinkage. The name “Bigfoot” does not refer to anything pedalogical.

By: Earle Williams

Earle Williams — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:51:20 +0000

Lucia,

It is coffee that goes out the nose. Coke, I believe, traditionally goes in the opposite direction.

By: Scooter

Scooter — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:47:44 +0000

As long as nobody feeds him Scottish sheep, he should flourish.

By: Andrew_KY

Andrew_KY — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:08:03 +0000

I can do without speculations on Sassy’s Shrinkage. Really. Quit.

Andrew

By: Jorge

Jorge — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:28:31 +0000

Golly! An honest man.

“We in the modelling community need to be a bit more humble about how precise our predictions are, and acknowledge the errors of estimates, which are huge, more than we do,” says Rahbek. “It’s just damn hard to predict the future.”

This is not climate science and perhaps it is much harder to predict where species may move to if it gets warmer.

On the other hand predicting where clouds will form should be much easier. Oh! They don´t do that very well either.