<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HadCrut &amp; NOAA October Temperature Anomalies: Lower than September.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/</link>
	<description>Where Climate Talk Gets Hot!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lucia</title>
		<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/comment-page-1/#comment-25812</link>
		<dc:creator>lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rankexploits.com/musings/?p=8102#comment-25812</guid>
		<description>Gaz--
&lt;blockquote&gt;Why not use last Wednesday?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The AR4 projections are based on a set of Scenarios that were published in late 2000 (roughly November, if memory serves me right.) January 2001 is the first month of the year after those SRES were defined. I prefer to test projections or predictions made &lt;I&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; the events could be observed. So, January 2001 is the first date I consider reasonable. Earlier dates permit comparison to &lt;i&gt;hindcasts&lt;/I&gt; because both the temperatures and the forcings had already occurred.

If you read my blog you will see that I regularly post comparisons beginning in many earlier years.  For example, in this post, you can see I show a graph beginning in 1990 as well as 2001.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaz&#8211;</p>
<blockquote><p>Why not use last Wednesday?</p></blockquote>
<p>The AR4 projections are based on a set of Scenarios that were published in late 2000 (roughly November, if memory serves me right.) January 2001 is the first month of the year after those SRES were defined. I prefer to test projections or predictions made <i>before</i> the events could be observed. So, January 2001 is the first date I consider reasonable. Earlier dates permit comparison to <i>hindcasts</i> because both the temperatures and the forcings had already occurred.</p>
<p>If you read my blog you will see that I regularly post comparisons beginning in many earlier years.  For example, in this post, you can see I show a graph beginning in 1990 as well as 2001.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaz</title>
		<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/comment-page-1/#comment-25781</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rankexploits.com/musings/?p=8102#comment-25781</guid>
		<description>&quot;..Jan 2001, which I use as my preferred start date...&quot;

Ha ha bloody ha.

Why not use last Wednesday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;..Jan 2001, which I use as my preferred start date&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Ha ha bloody ha.</p>
<p>Why not use last Wednesday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tetris</title>
		<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/comment-page-1/#comment-23987</link>
		<dc:creator>tetris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rankexploits.com/musings/?p=8102#comment-23987</guid>
		<description>Lucia,
I know weather is only weather, but West coast temps here in BC have been well below the norm with the exception of late September-early October, and there are new snow records being established both in terms of quantity and early in the season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucia,<br />
I know weather is only weather, but West coast temps here in BC have been well below the norm with the exception of late September-early October, and there are new snow records being established both in terms of quantity and early in the season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosspatch</title>
		<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/comment-page-1/#comment-23924</link>
		<dc:creator>crosspatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rankexploits.com/musings/?p=8102#comment-23924</guid>
		<description>I will agree that the first half of the month has seemed warm in the continental US but I am seeing indications that the second half of the month is going to be chilly.  Though the chill might start a bit too late to influence the monthly mean very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will agree that the first half of the month has seemed warm in the continental US but I am seeing indications that the second half of the month is going to be chilly.  Though the chill might start a bit too late to influence the monthly mean very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/comment-page-1/#comment-23900</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rankexploits.com/musings/?p=8102#comment-23900</guid>
		<description>Files for HadCRUT data are dated thru 3-9-2009.
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Files for HadCRUT data are dated thru 3-9-2009.<br />
<a href="http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/" >http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vg</title>
		<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/comment-page-1/#comment-23853</link>
		<dc:creator>vg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rankexploits.com/musings/?p=8102#comment-23853</guid>
		<description>refer to previous post to assess credibility of ANYTHING from British met Office</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>refer to previous post to assess credibility of ANYTHING from British met Office</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucia</title>
		<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/comment-page-1/#comment-23839</link>
		<dc:creator>lucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rankexploits.com/musings/?p=8102#comment-23839</guid>
		<description>tetris--
Yes. That said, temperature could still go up. It&#039;s been a warm November in Illinois.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tetris&#8211;<br />
Yes. That said, temperature could still go up. It&#8217;s been a warm November in Illinois.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/comment-page-1/#comment-23838</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rankexploits.com/musings/?p=8102#comment-23838</guid>
		<description>Previous HadCRUT temps keep getting adjusting upward month after month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previous HadCRUT temps keep getting adjusting upward month after month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tetris</title>
		<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/comment-page-1/#comment-23831</link>
		<dc:creator>tetris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rankexploits.com/musings/?p=8102#comment-23831</guid>
		<description>Interesting as we are experiencing an El Nino.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting as we are experiencing an El Nino.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Nieuwenhuis</title>
		<link>http://rankexploits.com/musings/2009/hadcrut-noaa-october-temperature-anomalies-lower-than-september/comment-page-1/#comment-23795</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Nieuwenhuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rankexploits.com/musings/?p=8102#comment-23795</guid>
		<description>Again, note that GIS, HADCRUT and NOAA do not have Canadian data.  See note from NOAA:

Please Note: This preliminary assessment was made before data from Canada was made available. Therefore, some of the ranks presented in this report could change slightly when Canadian data is included in the final record. The inclusion of the missing data may cause modest changes to global-scale ranks. The assessment for Northern Hemisphere land temperatures could change by several ranks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, note that GIS, HADCRUT and NOAA do not have Canadian data.  See note from NOAA:</p>
<p>Please Note: This preliminary assessment was made before data from Canada was made available. Therefore, some of the ranks presented in this report could change slightly when Canadian data is included in the final record. The inclusion of the missing data may cause modest changes to global-scale ranks. The assessment for Northern Hemisphere land temperatures could change by several ranks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
