{"id":17777,"date":"2011-10-17T17:28:29","date_gmt":"2011-10-17T23:28:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/?p=17777"},"modified":"2011-10-17T17:28:29","modified_gmt":"2011-10-17T23:28:29","slug":"ipcc-q-for-legal-eagles-strictly-prohibited-by-whom-or-what","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/2011\/ipcc-q-for-legal-eagles-strictly-prohibited-by-whom-or-what\/","title":{"rendered":"IPCC Q. for Legal Eagles: Strictly Prohibited by&#8230; whom or what?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I found this in<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ipcc-wg1.unibe.ch\/guidancepaper\/guidancenotes.html\">Confidentiality Guidance Note for Holders of Functions and Offices in IPCC Working Group I<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>As has become customary in the private sector, we also recommend for IPCC-related email traffic to add to the signature of your email a note that declares the content of the mail to be confidential and intended only for the addressee. One example which is currently being used by the WGI TSU is:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This e-mail including any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you have received it by mistake, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this e-mail in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s evidently <a href=\"http:\/\/volokh.com\/2011\/10\/03\/e-mail-confidentiality-statements-and-the-electronic-communications-privacy-act\/\">not prohibited by the wiretap act.<\/a>  Can anyone tell me what law I would be violating if somehow an IPCC email arrived in my in box and I disseminated it? <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I found this in Confidentiality Guidance Note for Holders of Functions and Offices in IPCC Working Group I As has become customary in the private sector, we also recommend for IPCC-related email traffic to add to the signature of your email a note that declares the content of the mail to be confidential and intended &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/2011\/ipcc-q-for-legal-eagles-strictly-prohibited-by-whom-or-what\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">IPCC Q. for Legal Eagles: Strictly Prohibited by&#8230; whom or what?<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[134],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17777","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17777"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17777\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}