{"id":25575,"date":"2016-11-10T09:23:16","date_gmt":"2016-11-10T15:23:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/?p=25575"},"modified":"2016-11-11T06:50:52","modified_gmt":"2016-11-11T12:50:52","slug":"climate-nonsense-oh-the-pain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/2016\/climate-nonsense-oh-the-pain\/","title":{"rendered":"Climate Nonsense: Oh the pain."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/news\/2016\/11\/what-trump-can-and-cant-do-all-himself-climate\">What Trump can\u00e2\u20ac\u201dand can&#8217;t\u00e2\u20ac\u201ddo all by himself on climate<\/a> by Paul Voosen at Science Mag:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>There are multiple paths Trump can take to undermining the U.S. ratification of the deal, which saw the country pledge to cut greenhouse gas emissions by up to 28% below 2005 levels by 2025. Under its requirements\u00e2\u20ac\u201dalready agreed to by the United States\u00e2\u20ac\u201dTrump could not immediately withdraw from the deal, but he could do so by 2020.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>We didn&#8217;t &#8220;ratify&#8221; anything.  The &#8220;country&#8221; didn&#8217;t pledge anything. <i>Obama<\/i> as executive, took a unilateral action which is not the same as the <I>US<\/I> ratifying anything because under our constitution, the <i>president<\/i> does not have the power to formally bind us to this sort of stuff. All Trump needs to do is to <I>say<\/i> this. Then if anyone disagrees, they can try to lodge a suit in courts, slog through to SCOTUS and see if they can get SCOTUS to agree that a president (i.e. Obama) <i>can<\/I> formally bind the country to an &#8220;agreement&#8221; without ratification by the Senate using the &#8216;magic&#8217; of not using the word &#8220;treaty&#8221; to describe &#8220;a formally concluded and ratified agreement between countries&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The fact is: The US has <I>not<\/I> ratified the &#8220;formal agreement between countries&#8221; called the Paris Climate Agreement. Sorry, but no. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>More simply, &#8220;they could just fail to deliver on U.S. commitment and reverse strong leadership at the international level that the Obama administration provided,&#8221; says Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Yes. And this would be perfectly legitimate because the Obama administration may have wanted to provide &#8220;strong leadership at the international level&#8221; but he failed to get US agreement. And whether he wanted to use his pen to sign the document or not, the US <I>did not ratify<\/i>. No matter what someone prefers vis-a-vi climate change, ratification of treaties by the Senate is an important constitutional principle. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>China has been vocal about the need for the United States to live up to its international obligations. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Sorry China: But we don&#8217;t have any. And I&#8217;m guessing you are not actually babes in the woods and knew perfectly well Obama&#8217;s signature did not mean anything. <\/p>\n<p>As it happens, the constitutional issue is sufficiently important that Trump should simply announce that the &#8220;agreement&#8221; would represent a treaty. That treaty has not been ratified. And so we are not bound by it. Period. I would say this for <I>any<\/i> treaty a president tries to bind the US to in such an unconstitutional manner. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What Trump can\u00e2\u20ac\u201dand can&#8217;t\u00e2\u20ac\u201ddo all by himself on climate by Paul Voosen at Science Mag: There are multiple paths Trump can take to undermining the U.S. ratification of the deal, which saw the country pledge to cut greenhouse gas emissions by up to 28% below 2005 levels by 2025. Under its requirements\u00e2\u20ac\u201dalready agreed to by &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/2016\/climate-nonsense-oh-the-pain\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Climate Nonsense: Oh the pain.<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[134],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25575\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rankexploits.com\/musings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}