NOAA’s May anomaly is 0.5225C down from 0.5990C currently recorded for April and also down from 0.6050 C reported for April during May. 
Anomalies with trends since both 2000 and 2001 are shown above. The trend since 2001 is negative. The trend since 2000 is positive, but less than the nomimal IPCC trend of “about 2C/century.” Are you wondering about the trend since the La Nina trough in 1999? It’s 0.14C/decade, also lower than the IPCC “About 2 C/century”.
More later when Hadley posts.
Lucia,
” The trend since 2000 is negative. The trend since 2001 is positive,…”
Might this be backward??
lucia just a question re your last two posts. Is it 0.599C or 0.0599C?
Lots of number rearranging at NOAA recently. Even the OI.v2 SST data got tweaked between June 1 and June 9.
http://bobtisdale.blogspot.com/2009/06/corrections-to-oiv2-sst-data-for-may.html
WE really need guys like B Tisdale to keep them honest. Nearly all the NOAA data (ice, temps, etc) seems to becoming junky lately. The only reliable temp/ice data in my biased view are RSS UHA, DMI and NANSEN (only lately though NANSEN seems they don’t want to be part of the charade anymore LOL)
If adjusted for UHI according to A watts, maybe GISS, HADCRUT etc might be considered remotely close to being reliable.
Geoff: Here are the temperaures cut and pasted:
2009 1 0.5469
2009 2 0.5048
2009 3 0.5392
2009 4 0.5990
2009 5 0.5225
So, 0.5990C for april.
VG– There is no reason to suspect the data jumping around currently is due to bias.
It seems that we are going to have to see one hell of a temp (atmospheric) jump from now on to stay above 0 anomaly for the rest of the year. One hell of a prediction I admit!
http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/
Check ALL channels.
Lucia: Probably right re temp/ice data jumping around now NOAA and NSIDC ..but there is definitely is a surface UHI temp bias (refer to WUWT ad infinitum…)
VG: You wrote, “WE really need guys like B Tisdale to keep them honest.”
Thanks for the thought but I mistook preliminary June 2009 SST data for final June 2009 data. My misunderstanding about the timing of NOAA’s final monthly version of their OI.v2 SST data is discussed in the following post:
http://bobtisdale.blogspot.com/2009/06/well-there-ya-have-it-oiv2-sst-data.html
Regards